Skip to main content

PREVALENCE OF COLORISM IN BLACK AMERICAN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS



By: Cailey Griffin

    It would be extremely difficult to make the argument that the media doesn’t have power. The media has the power to foster a sense of community amongst people by bringing friends and family together to view a television show. The media has the power to regulate the emotions of individuals by creating fictional characters the average viewer will become attached to. The media also has the power to serve as a representation of the different “types” of people in society. In media platforms there’s usually a clear representation of what it means to be a man, what it means to be a woman, what it means to be a person of color, and what it means to be a person from a particular socioeconomic background. These media representations of different groups and types of people are not always incorrect or negative. In fact, I would argue that media representations are largely positive for certain people. However, the group that seems to consistently get the short end of the stick in media representations are people of color in general, and more specifically Black Americans.
    Media seems to operate as a reflection of the values and opinions of the society around it. Many White Americans tend to view Black women as being “loud” and “ghetto”, so that’s how many Black women are represented in the media. Many White Americans also tend to view Black men as violent and dangerous, so that’s what leads to the depiction of Black men as “thugs” and “gangsters” in many media depictions. Black Americans have also been represented in media through the lens of colorism for a long time even though conversations surrounding the issue have just begun.
     In the article Pride and Prejudice: Pervasiveness of Colorism and the Animated Series Proud Family, Catherine Knight Steele addresses the fact that even within a popular cartoon that depicts the strong and positive bond of an African American family, like The Proud Family, colorism still makes its way into character representations in the show (Steele, 2016, p. 53). Steele defines colorism as “a worldwide phenomenon of discrimination wherein people are given certain status and privilege based on the physical features of skin color, facial features, and hair textures” (Steele, 2016, p. 53). The people receiving a particular status and privilege are often people with lighter skin (Steele, 2016, p. 53). This preference towards things like lighter skin, more European features, and a looser hair texture stems from the fact that people view those traits as factors that make a person closer to European ancestry, and in turn superior.


    Steele first addresses the presence of colorism in the characters “The Gross Sisters” from the show The Proud Family (Steele, 2016, p. 60). The Gross Sisters are Penny Proud’s classmates who are considered bullies and all have very deep dark skin that appears to be a shade of blue (Steel, 2016, p. 60). The Gross Sisters also wear their hair in natural styling, specifically cornrows, and they all have a body type not in alignment with the traditional European beauty standard of being thin (Steele, 2016, p. 60). Steele shares that at one point Penny even refers to them as “monsters” when making the point she does not consider them to be one of her friends (Steele, 2016, p. 60).
    The Gross Sisters are a perfect representation of colorism in the show because their role supports the narrative that dark skin Black women are somehow less than their lighter skin counterparts. In the media, dark skin women are often portrayed as being less attractive and more aggressive than light skin women. The Gross Sisters fit this role by being characterized as the school bully and even being considered less than human by Penny.
    Ultimately, the depiction of The Gross Sisters in the show was most harmful to the darker skin black children who watched it. Narratives such as the one depicted by The Gross Sisters leads dark skin Black children to believe that their skin is less than, having the hair that grows out of their head in its natural state is wrong, and being a body type other than thin makes them less attractive. When children feed into these ideals presented by the media, they grow up internalizing this idea and then cause the cycle to keep continue by intentionally or unintentionally instilling the same ideas in their own children.
    To combat this narrative of darker skin black women, without European presenting features, their needs to be an alternative depiction to the one presented of The Gross Sisters in The Proud Family. If The Gross Sisters storyline is absolutely essential to the functioning of the show, fine; however, there should also be a depiction of darker skin black women, who look like The Gross Sisters, and who are also kind, generally considered attractive, and educated to combat the negative narrative in the show.


Words: 813


Keywords: #Colorism #The Proud Family #darkskin #light skin #beauty #european beauty standards #Media


References:


Steele, C. K. (2016). Pride and Prejudice: Pervasiveness of Colorism and the Animated Series Proud Family. Howard Journal of Communications, 27(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2015.1117028


“The Gross Sisters.” Wickedpedia. Photo [JPG]. disneyvillains.wikia.com/wiki/The_Gross_Sisters.

Comments

  1. Cailey,

    Bit of a mixed bag here. On the one hand, you've located a provocative bit of media/cultural criticism and offered some additional insight into this Disney produced TV show. Recall our brief conversation on Giroux's critique of Disney in terms of film & television as "teaching machines."

    On the other hand, at over 800 words, this runs much longer than required. The give away is the "set up" in your first couple of paragraphs. While those generalizations are well taken, it's best to take a page from Hollywood with these posts and "cut to the chase."

    In other words, open your essay with a brief introduction to either the show or the concept of colorism. Then run with it!

    Equally important, while you do a fine job summarizing Steele's critique, its time to take the next step and begin deploying the literature to inform a more original analysis. For instance, Steele's analysis has profound implications given the target demographic of this program. You might consider this at some length here.

    Finally, your formatting doesn't follow our "house style" and I note a few errors of punctuation throughout.

    25 pts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BORN (TOO BLACK) THIS WAY

By Faith Blakey  My nighttime routine consists of scrolling through my Facebook timeline. More recently, it has been filled with social issues that are both domestic and international; from fashion, politics, to personality tests. One of the most striking posts that I have come across recently was a clip from a documentary; “So when you bleach it makes you look more nicer, look more sexier, and look more cuter than you once was”. These words from a middle aged Jamaican women describes the sentiments that are sold with the global trend of skin bleaching. Her opinions towards skin bleaching, or “bleaching”  as they call it in Jamaica, are common. This 2012 Vice documentary explores the idea that skin bleaching and colorism are practices that have  become well known and respected in popular Jamaican culture. Although this documentary reveals the deep seated colorism that is prominent in Jamaica, it seems as if colorism has developed into a worldwide epidemi...

HANDS UP

By: Leda Turpen Throughout this week, my group is examining how politics have grown with the introduction of modern popular and celebrity culture in our society. While this is our main focus, I would like to shed light on an activism from the perspective of minority professional athletes, specifically the consequences they face when exercising their constitutional right to voice and demonstrate their political stances. I argue that minority celebrity athletes face a social identity threat when protesting for or against current political events, thus, are hesitant to speak up about them. Undoubtedly, our society is no stranger to the kind of reactions and responses celebrity activism can create. One prominent example being the case of Michael Brown, an African American who was shot in killed by a white police officer (Sanderson, Frederick, and Stocz, 2016). Shortly after the incident, the officer was not prosecuted, causing tension immediately (2016, p. 302). After the verdict, fi...