Skip to main content

PREVALENCE OF COLORISM IN BLACK AMERICAN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS



By: Cailey Griffin

    It would be extremely difficult to make the argument that the media doesn’t have power. The media has the power to foster a sense of community amongst people by bringing friends and family together to view a television show. The media has the power to regulate the emotions of individuals by creating fictional characters the average viewer will become attached to. The media also has the power to serve as a representation of the different “types” of people in society. In media platforms there’s usually a clear representation of what it means to be a man, what it means to be a woman, what it means to be a person of color, and what it means to be a person from a particular socioeconomic background. These media representations of different groups and types of people are not always incorrect or negative. In fact, I would argue that media representations are largely positive for certain people. However, the group that seems to consistently get the short end of the stick in media representations are people of color in general, and more specifically Black Americans.
    Media seems to operate as a reflection of the values and opinions of the society around it. Many White Americans tend to view Black women as being “loud” and “ghetto”, so that’s how many Black women are represented in the media. Many White Americans also tend to view Black men as violent and dangerous, so that’s what leads to the depiction of Black men as “thugs” and “gangsters” in many media depictions. Black Americans have also been represented in media through the lens of colorism for a long time even though conversations surrounding the issue have just begun.
     In the article Pride and Prejudice: Pervasiveness of Colorism and the Animated Series Proud Family, Catherine Knight Steele addresses the fact that even within a popular cartoon that depicts the strong and positive bond of an African American family, like The Proud Family, colorism still makes its way into character representations in the show (Steele, 2016, p. 53). Steele defines colorism as “a worldwide phenomenon of discrimination wherein people are given certain status and privilege based on the physical features of skin color, facial features, and hair textures” (Steele, 2016, p. 53). The people receiving a particular status and privilege are often people with lighter skin (Steele, 2016, p. 53). This preference towards things like lighter skin, more European features, and a looser hair texture stems from the fact that people view those traits as factors that make a person closer to European ancestry, and in turn superior.


    Steele first addresses the presence of colorism in the characters “The Gross Sisters” from the show The Proud Family (Steele, 2016, p. 60). The Gross Sisters are Penny Proud’s classmates who are considered bullies and all have very deep dark skin that appears to be a shade of blue (Steel, 2016, p. 60). The Gross Sisters also wear their hair in natural styling, specifically cornrows, and they all have a body type not in alignment with the traditional European beauty standard of being thin (Steele, 2016, p. 60). Steele shares that at one point Penny even refers to them as “monsters” when making the point she does not consider them to be one of her friends (Steele, 2016, p. 60).
    The Gross Sisters are a perfect representation of colorism in the show because their role supports the narrative that dark skin Black women are somehow less than their lighter skin counterparts. In the media, dark skin women are often portrayed as being less attractive and more aggressive than light skin women. The Gross Sisters fit this role by being characterized as the school bully and even being considered less than human by Penny.
    Ultimately, the depiction of The Gross Sisters in the show was most harmful to the darker skin black children who watched it. Narratives such as the one depicted by The Gross Sisters leads dark skin Black children to believe that their skin is less than, having the hair that grows out of their head in its natural state is wrong, and being a body type other than thin makes them less attractive. When children feed into these ideals presented by the media, they grow up internalizing this idea and then cause the cycle to keep continue by intentionally or unintentionally instilling the same ideas in their own children.
    To combat this narrative of darker skin black women, without European presenting features, their needs to be an alternative depiction to the one presented of The Gross Sisters in The Proud Family. If The Gross Sisters storyline is absolutely essential to the functioning of the show, fine; however, there should also be a depiction of darker skin black women, who look like The Gross Sisters, and who are also kind, generally considered attractive, and educated to combat the negative narrative in the show.


Words: 813


Keywords: #Colorism #The Proud Family #darkskin #light skin #beauty #european beauty standards #Media


References:


Steele, C. K. (2016). Pride and Prejudice: Pervasiveness of Colorism and the Animated Series Proud Family. Howard Journal of Communications, 27(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2015.1117028


“The Gross Sisters.” Wickedpedia. Photo [JPG]. disneyvillains.wikia.com/wiki/The_Gross_Sisters.

Comments

  1. Cailey,

    Bit of a mixed bag here. On the one hand, you've located a provocative bit of media/cultural criticism and offered some additional insight into this Disney produced TV show. Recall our brief conversation on Giroux's critique of Disney in terms of film & television as "teaching machines."

    On the other hand, at over 800 words, this runs much longer than required. The give away is the "set up" in your first couple of paragraphs. While those generalizations are well taken, it's best to take a page from Hollywood with these posts and "cut to the chase."

    In other words, open your essay with a brief introduction to either the show or the concept of colorism. Then run with it!

    Equally important, while you do a fine job summarizing Steele's critique, its time to take the next step and begin deploying the literature to inform a more original analysis. For instance, Steele's analysis has profound implications given the target demographic of this program. You might consider this at some length here.

    Finally, your formatting doesn't follow our "house style" and I note a few errors of punctuation throughout.

    25 pts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DO THESE CELEBRITIES ACTUALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

By Maggie Wagenbrenner Over the past few years, we have seen some big changes in the political world of the United States.  With the advancement of technology and the rising popularity of social media, many people are able to voice their opinions for the world to see and reflect on, some of those people are celebrities. We are constantly hearing and seeing celebrities endorsing politicians of their liking, but the question must be asked: do these celebrities actually make a difference? I argue that the rise of social media has led to celebrities having a far reaching effect on voters  due to the social identification theory and the parasocial relationship construct. Social identification theory is defined as “people adopt[ing] attitude or behavior from another person because they associate it with a satisfying, self-defining relationship with that person” (Um, 2018). A similar concept is touched on in Dustin Kidd’s book, Social Media Freaks: Digital Identity in t...

SNLS POLITICAL PARODIES: IRONICALLY FUEL FOR THE FAR RIGHT?

By Natalie Raskas The American public seems to have a problem with discernment, confusing entertainment with the reality of the real-world consequences of politics more and more and Saturday Night Live (SNL) may be to blame. Nickie Michaud Wild writes in his research article, “Dumb vs. Fake: Representations of Bush and Palin on Saturday Night Live and Their Effects on the journalistic Public Sphere,” that “The observation that news and entertainment are becoming more alike has been met with derision or with acceptance.” This “infotainment” element became popular in American media starting in the 1980s with the advent of cable news and only has grown to be a stronger and more polarizing feature in today’s political climate (Wild, 2015, p.495). To most Americans supporting the political left, Donald Trump, the presidential candidate, now President, became a joke – thanks in part to SNL ’s spot on political satire sketches. We laughed until we cried on election night when the unima...

AS SEEN ON THE NEWS: BLACK MEN AND VIOLENCE

By Destiney Davis Growing up as an African American female has been the best of times, but also the worst at times. But, through every struggle I had my father to fall back on. Dennis Davis, a 6-foot African American male with three kids, a loving wife and the heart of the nicest man alive. Who would fear that? Unfortunately, many people fear just that but why? African American males are often portrayed as monsters and thugs more whether that be in television, movies and especially the news. In American culture, black men are faced with this double life because they are seen as amazing for athletic abilities but in the social world they are looked down upon and judged by untrue stereotypes. The news often portrays these black males as overly masculine and aggressive towards anyone and everyone around them. Not only is news a problem, but black men are often underrepresented in roles that do not include violence or an increase in masculinity which would include the ster...