Skip to main content
NOT AS PRIVATE AS YOU THINK 
By Emmanuel Koutsouras 
Say you are browsing the internet, maybe reading a movie review, looking through amazon to find a video game you want. Then you decide to go on Instagram sometime later and see an ad for something closely related to that movie review or video game. Social media is arguably the largest collective platform of information that the world has ever seen. There probably is not a single person who is completely off the grid. Social media brings people, ideas, thoughts, facts, and opinions together, in a way that nothing else can do. People put so much of their personal information on the various social media platforms, assuming safety as a given. As is the case with most things in life, nothing is a guarantee, though. The power of surveillance, which when you think about it is truly disturbing is “that people whose personal data are collected or observed may not know when or if they are being watched” (Humphreys, 2008).  
 
The process of surveillance is typically carried out across multiple systems, bureaucracies, and social connections all converging into “surveillant assemblages” and embedded within everyday life (Lyon, Haggerty, & Ball, 2012). Social media sites are increasingly resembling such assemblages, as they draw in data on user activity elsewhere on the internet via “cookies” and other tracking mechanisms, this how you see ads for things on social media you were looking up on a different website (like a video game on amazon), and from other sources of information on users, such as retailer loyalty cards, customer surveys, and smartphone location traces. Surveillance is an ancient social process, such as guards for buildings during ancient times, but in the late twentieth century, surveillance became a central organizing social practice, affecting power dynamics, institutional practice, and interpersonal relations. Alongside changing technology, this transformation was driven by factors including increasing managerialism, greater public perception of risk, and political expediency. 
Some factors need to be taken in to account when considering an instance of social media surveillance. Who is carrying it out? A business dealing with customers, or profiling and marketing to potential customers? A community of individuals? What are the power relations between the surveillers and the surveilled? What kinds of data are being collected, and by what means? These might include narrative reports, audiovisual recordings, or activity traces, relating to public, personal, private, sensitive, or intimate situations. In this day in age, all of this now takes place via social media. The rapid development of computing technologies, and the social, political, and economic practices that have shaped and been shaped by this development, is one of the most significant enablers of social media surveillance. Regularly, whole sites or individual profiles are hacked, resulting in private information being released to the public. Recall the mass hacking of iCloud in 2015, in which a number of celebrities had their personal pictures stolen and uploaded to public sites. However, it is not just hackers that can get access to private information. Police investigators will use the law to allow them to collect information from a site, which would otherwise have been considered private information. This is information for everyone. College students need to pay extra attention to this. Your career might be saved.  


References 
Ball, K., Haggerty, K. D., & Lyon, D. (27 mar 2012). Surveillance as biopower. Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. 
Humphreys, L. (2008). Who's Watching Whom? A Field study of Interactive Technology and Surveillance. Conference Papers -- International Communication Association, 1-26. Retrieved from Communication and Mass Media Complete database. 

Word count: 536 


Comments

  1. KHSeptember 14, 2018 at 9:27 AM

    Emmanuel,

    This is a fine topic for your post. It clearly fits with your group's "theme week" and addresses the rise of surveillance regimes within and through digital technology.

    So far, so good.

    However, there are several glaring problems with your post. First, you haven't used our "house style" for these essays – something we've talked about often and at length in class and via email.

    Second, your use of APA reference style is likewise prone to error. Seems you haven't consulted the reference resources we've discussed throughout the semester.

    Third, and most critically, there are several passages that are clearly NOT your own words. Rather, they are taken straight from published work without attribution. This is UNACCEPTABLE and could lead to disciplinary action.

    I suggest you review the university's policy on such matters. After all, if you are violating procedure for this assignment, you may be doing in your other course work. And that could lead to some real problems.

    In sum, you haven't followed directions very closely, despite repeated guidance to do so. What's more, you are flirting with issues of academic integrity that could have serious consequences.

    15/30 pts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NO MORE DAISY DUKES

By Colleen Kelly This thematic series has begun to establish that female sexuality is an aspect of the music industry capable of crossing genre barriers. Country music has traditionally been labeled the genre with the least emphasis on female sexuality because of its socially conservative themes (Aubrey & Frisby, 2011, p. 477). I challenge this notion with my assertion that sexuality has always been present in country music but has undergone a change from a form of feminist liberation to a tool to objectify women. In the history of country music, particularly visible in the 1990s, there is a long-standing tradition of female artists using their music to advance feminist ideals and reclaim their sexuality (Berlatsky, 2014). Let me be clear that I am not asserting that these musicians are the long-awaited saviors of women. Rather, these female artists utilized the media to challenge societal norms surrounding gender and sexuality. Shania Twain was not only one of the biggest ...
6 comments
Read more

ARTISTRY WITHIN ACTIVISM

By: Sarah Selzer When armchair theorizing political activism, pop-culture has been noted as the driving force of political change. However, this notion truly comes to life when we look at the history of how hip-hop could be considered the voice of our generation, specifically containing the critical area for the emergence of hip-hop feminism. Concerning political movements that stemming from the base of hip-hop music influence, female artists not only used their platform as a form of sexual and artistic expression but to highlight problems within Grassroots- Black Community politics (Collins, 2014). Primarily Black and Latino youth were denied access to basic education, decent housing, recreational activities, and music lessons stemming from the early to mid-1900’s (Collins, 2014). Instead of feeling defeated, young-female black youths took the time to create new art forms of music that challenged the stereotypes of being born into poverty which ultimately gave them opportunit...
4 comments
Read more

SINCE WHEN DID POLITICIANS BECOME CELEBRITIES?

By Katharine McLean I distinctly remember the day Donald Trump announced that he was going to be running for president. I was sitting at my kitchen table with my mother as the highlights of his speech came on the news. That is when my mom rolled her eyes and says, “Well, this will be pretty entertaining.” She wasn’t wrong. I argue that the mediatized age that we live in has caused politicians to integrate celebrity tactics that can threaten the integrity of our politics, turning politicians and politics into a form of entertainment. A study conducted by Matthew Wood, Jack Corbett, and Matthew Flinders finds that past and current politicians are “gain(ing) popularity by adopting strategies from within the world of entertainment” (2016). Their research finds that there are two types of celebrity politicians based on what celebrity tactics are adopted based on three categories-- media platforms, marketing techniques and performative roles. When looking at Donald Trump thr...
5 comments
Read more