Skip to main content

PRIVACY IN SOCIAL MEDIA

PRIVACY IN SOCIAL MEDIA

By Nate Stapleton

When it comes to social media, users expect that their personal information is private.  I am currently involved in multiple social media platforms, two of which are Facebook and Twitter.  Both Facebook and Twitter have been under the microscope when it comes to users’ privacy concerns.  I put little thought or concern on what kind of personal information I was revealing on social media but now it is time to take a step back and think about the consequences that come with doing so.

Studies on social media users reveal that they are somewhat unaware of the risks that come with privacy (Choon, 2018).  Social media users put their real names on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter in order to benefit from “self-exposure” rather than thinking about the risks that come with it (Gross & Acquisiti, 2005).  When one practices “self-exposure” they are visibly exposing themselves and everything they post on social media to their followers or anyone else.  By doing so, their privacy is at risk.

Showing too much on social media can have its consequences.  An example of this comes from a British trainee that learned the hard way about posting on social media (Choon, 2018).  Trainee Kevin Colvin gave his employer a false reason for not being able to make it to work.  Instead he went to a Halloween party and posted a picture of himself at the event on Facebook.  One of his colleagues saw the picture, showed it to his employer, and he was deservingly let go (Choon, 2018).  When a user exposes oneself like this, it is likely to end poorly due to the fact that there is no privacy in social media.

Even so, Facebook and Twitter users have beliefs on social media that may be surprising.  Choon highlights the studies found by Raynes-Goldie (2010):

“Scholars have examined users’ privacy concerns. Raynes-Goldie (2010) conducted an ethnographic study of the privacy practices of 20 Canadian users. Most of them were concerned about the control of personal information during social interactions (social privacy). According to the researcher, users care less about the use of personal information by institutions and third parties (institutional privacy)” (Choon, 2018).

After the researcher immersed himself in the study of privacy in social media we see that users are not worried about their personal information and content when it comes to institutions (Choon, 2018).
Image result for twitter and facebook
Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have great benefits but privacy will always be an issue.  As long as users are putting their personal information on these platforms, other users and even members working for Facebook and Twitter can see what users post and information you may think is private.  Taking a step back and checking what one reveals on social media may not be such a bad idea.

References

Boyd D. (2009). American teen sociality in networked publics Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley

Kwok Choon, M. J. (2018). Revisiting the Privacy Paradox on Social Media: An Analysis of Privacy Practices Associated with Facebook and Twitter. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43(2), 339-358. Retrieved from Communication and Mass Media Complete database.

Gross R. & Acquisiti A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (the facebook case) Research presented at the workshop on privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES). Alexandria, VA

Raynes-Goldie K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: understanding privacy in the age of facebook. First Monday Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2775/2432


Word Count: 473



Comments

  1. Nate,

    This is something of a mixed bag. On one hand, your post makes good use of academic research the examines issues of privacy in digital space. This certainly fits in with your group's "theme week" issue. Equally important, it addresses some core concerns in contemporary media studies.

    On the other hand, formatting issues, including, but not limited to your use of "block quotes" and APA citation style undermine your efforts. Then there's the broken link to the image you embedded in your post.

    Finally, the word count falls a bit short of our mark (500-600 words).

    In sum, you ought to work on your proof reading skills and take a bit more time, effort and care in crafting an essay that fulfills the basic requirements for this and other assignments.

    22/30 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nate, just a few things of note, some that go along with what Professor Howley has already mentioned.

    Firstly, make sure to list your title only once at the top of your page, listing it a second time is redundant.

    Second, I tend to stray away from block quotes whenever possible - a bit less reliance on direct citations lets us hear what YOU have to say about a specific topic (especially since this is a very brief post). If you are citing; however, be sure that your text format is consistent with our guidelines, not Times New Roman.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nate,

    I think your post brings up many good points regarding privacy in media. I wish you would've talked more about Snapchat as well. I think it is interesting because most users believe the snaps will "disappear," but do they really? And are they retrievable somehow? I think most people don't really think about Snapchat as much as they should. Just something to think about. But I know people often post without thinking about the consequences or who will see it. You had a good example of how the man's colleagues saw a picture posted on Facebook when he was supposed to be sick. On the one hand, we should be able to live our lives and post what we want without getting in "trouble," but we should also be thinking about who we are sharing these aspects of our lives with. It wasn't always that your ex from 10 years ago could still see what is going on in your life now (as just one example to think about).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

INFOTAINMENT: A SOURCE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY AND PARTICIPATION

By Georges Azouri Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Trevor Noah. These are all household names of television hosts on shows such as The Daily Show and The Colbert Report . Both shows are infotainment programs that inform their viewers on current news and entertain them in a satirical way. While there is great comedic value provided by these programs, there is even greater value to the political culture of the United States. Infotainment programs are not new, rather the influence they can have on an audience is new. Shows like The Daily Show or The Colbert Report share news stories and often political stories in a satirical manner. In doing so these programs are still educating audiences on politics even if it may be skewed. Political efficacy is the belief that one is able to strongly influence politics and usually is tied to political participation. A study done on adolescents showed that, “nontraditional sources of political information on television (late-night comedy) i...

VLOGGING; MIXED BLESSING

By Stella Ahn Vlogging; video blogging is one of the most common types of user-generated content in social media, especially in YouTube. Increasing attention toward Vlog and Vlogger have made another kind of celebrities. YouTube celebrities make revenue from various sources based on their contents and fame such as advertisement and sponsorship. As they became rich and popular, they have huge impact on their followers. Their contents can encourage social movement and people in minor community. On the other hand, growing trend of Vlogging also can cause negative effect. Therefore, this post will discuss about how Vlogging effect for both producer and consumer.    Vloggers have advantages in terms of communication and interaction, because they can communicate directly with their followers via contents and comments. This characteristic of social media made Vlog celebrities be able to have influence among social movements and communities. Arthurs take an example of...

KAVANAUGH: SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH

By John Pasch The United States Supreme Court is arguably the most powerful institution of the government  next to only the President. Recently, a spot became vacant on the Court and President Donald Trump appointed judge Brett Kavanaugh to fill the position. The appointment and installment,  however, didn’t go as smoothly as people had hoped or anticipated.                                                After Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, there was a swarm of sexual misconduct allegations, worthy of disqualification. As striking as this may seem, cases like this have become all too common today. They either didn’t exist in such a multitude in the earlier years of American politics/society, which is unlikely, or they have simply become more public, which is what I am willing to put my money on. The question then becomes: how do allegation...