Skip to main content

PRIVACY IN SOCIAL MEDIA

PRIVACY IN SOCIAL MEDIA

By Nate Stapleton

When it comes to social media, users expect that their personal information is private.  I am currently involved in multiple social media platforms, two of which are Facebook and Twitter.  Both Facebook and Twitter have been under the microscope when it comes to users’ privacy concerns.  I put little thought or concern on what kind of personal information I was revealing on social media but now it is time to take a step back and think about the consequences that come with doing so.

Studies on social media users reveal that they are somewhat unaware of the risks that come with privacy (Choon, 2018).  Social media users put their real names on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter in order to benefit from “self-exposure” rather than thinking about the risks that come with it (Gross & Acquisiti, 2005).  When one practices “self-exposure” they are visibly exposing themselves and everything they post on social media to their followers or anyone else.  By doing so, their privacy is at risk.

Showing too much on social media can have its consequences.  An example of this comes from a British trainee that learned the hard way about posting on social media (Choon, 2018).  Trainee Kevin Colvin gave his employer a false reason for not being able to make it to work.  Instead he went to a Halloween party and posted a picture of himself at the event on Facebook.  One of his colleagues saw the picture, showed it to his employer, and he was deservingly let go (Choon, 2018).  When a user exposes oneself like this, it is likely to end poorly due to the fact that there is no privacy in social media.

Even so, Facebook and Twitter users have beliefs on social media that may be surprising.  Choon highlights the studies found by Raynes-Goldie (2010):

“Scholars have examined users’ privacy concerns. Raynes-Goldie (2010) conducted an ethnographic study of the privacy practices of 20 Canadian users. Most of them were concerned about the control of personal information during social interactions (social privacy). According to the researcher, users care less about the use of personal information by institutions and third parties (institutional privacy)” (Choon, 2018).

After the researcher immersed himself in the study of privacy in social media we see that users are not worried about their personal information and content when it comes to institutions (Choon, 2018).
Image result for twitter and facebook
Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have great benefits but privacy will always be an issue.  As long as users are putting their personal information on these platforms, other users and even members working for Facebook and Twitter can see what users post and information you may think is private.  Taking a step back and checking what one reveals on social media may not be such a bad idea.

References

Boyd D. (2009). American teen sociality in networked publics Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley

Kwok Choon, M. J. (2018). Revisiting the Privacy Paradox on Social Media: An Analysis of Privacy Practices Associated with Facebook and Twitter. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43(2), 339-358. Retrieved from Communication and Mass Media Complete database.

Gross R. & Acquisiti A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (the facebook case) Research presented at the workshop on privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES). Alexandria, VA

Raynes-Goldie K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: understanding privacy in the age of facebook. First Monday Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2775/2432


Word Count: 473



Comments

  1. Nate,

    This is something of a mixed bag. On one hand, your post makes good use of academic research the examines issues of privacy in digital space. This certainly fits in with your group's "theme week" issue. Equally important, it addresses some core concerns in contemporary media studies.

    On the other hand, formatting issues, including, but not limited to your use of "block quotes" and APA citation style undermine your efforts. Then there's the broken link to the image you embedded in your post.

    Finally, the word count falls a bit short of our mark (500-600 words).

    In sum, you ought to work on your proof reading skills and take a bit more time, effort and care in crafting an essay that fulfills the basic requirements for this and other assignments.

    22/30 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nate, just a few things of note, some that go along with what Professor Howley has already mentioned.

    Firstly, make sure to list your title only once at the top of your page, listing it a second time is redundant.

    Second, I tend to stray away from block quotes whenever possible - a bit less reliance on direct citations lets us hear what YOU have to say about a specific topic (especially since this is a very brief post). If you are citing; however, be sure that your text format is consistent with our guidelines, not Times New Roman.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nate,

    I think your post brings up many good points regarding privacy in media. I wish you would've talked more about Snapchat as well. I think it is interesting because most users believe the snaps will "disappear," but do they really? And are they retrievable somehow? I think most people don't really think about Snapchat as much as they should. Just something to think about. But I know people often post without thinking about the consequences or who will see it. You had a good example of how the man's colleagues saw a picture posted on Facebook when he was supposed to be sick. On the one hand, we should be able to live our lives and post what we want without getting in "trouble," but we should also be thinking about who we are sharing these aspects of our lives with. It wasn't always that your ex from 10 years ago could still see what is going on in your life now (as just one example to think about).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

STUDENT-ATHLETES AND MENTAL HEALTH

STUDENT-ATHLETES AND MENTAL HEALTH Jarrod Stiver There has always been a common misconception that student-athletes do not struggle with mental health issues outside of sports. Typically, athletes believe  must be tough, show no signs of weakness or they will be beat. Many people who see these athletes, automatically think of who they are on the field, court or track; and envision themselves doing that and being that “star” with their abilities, and fame. The people who believe their heroes have the most perfect lives going to school for free to play sports, and having people flock after them at any given second of their lives. However, we can day dream about their lives all we want but the fact is that mental health issues such as; anxiety, depression, substance abuse, eating disorders, and many more still apply to our heroes on the field. No matter the amount of money someone makes or the things that are given to them, mental health issues can still ta...

WHAT MADE THE L WORD SO GROUNDBREAKING?

By Pia Ocvirk Historically, lesbian characters have been virtually non-existent on American television. Ellen DeGeneres’s televised coming out on her popular show Ellen in 1997 paved the way for lesbian characters in primetime television. Despite the gains made for lesbian characters, they were and still are, more often than not, portrayed in heterosexual narratives and tailored almost solely for a heterosexual audience (Lee & Meyer, 2010). When The L Word premiered on Showtime in 2004, the show became the first ever to feature the main cast of exclusively queer women, most of whom were lesbians. Written, created and directed by women for women, the show told stories that had never before been seen on television (Bendix, 2017). The L Word touched on subjects such as same-sex parenting, “don’t ask, don’t tell,” addiction, cancer, disability, coming out and, most importantly, the heterosexual male gaze. The L Word made the male gaze a central issue in its first two season...

JOCK STEREOTYPES IN FILM

By Chase Andries It is common when people think of a jock today, the majority imagine an athlete. An athlete who is successful in their sport, aggressive, violent, arrogant, unintelligent, dim-witted, and foolish; a powerful figure in their society who thinks they are untouchable and above everyone else. American film mirrors these same ideas and principles in our culture today. The characters that play the athletes regularly share the same characteristics as the “typical jock” we think of in our society. For example, in the movie, 17 again starring Zac Efron, is a character named Stan. Stan is the captain of the basketball team, a delinquent, and a bully who follows the stereotypes of being aggressive, unintelligent, and violent which is displayed throughout the film. Stan is clearly the athletic jock from start to finish, but there seems to be an underlying stigma that factors into his character the audience may not realize. In the movie , the main protagonist na...