Skip to main content

SIDELINING THE NFL ANTHEM RULE

By Freddie Coudret

            Protesting in the National Football League (NFL) has been an extremely polarizing subject ever since Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid of the San Francisco 49ers first took a knee during the national anthem on September 1st, 2017. Kaepernick responded to criticism by revealing that his reasoning for kneeling during the anthem was to shine a light on police brutality against minorities and social inequality. When I stated that this has been a polarizing issue since its inception- I meant it. People from all walks of life; sports fans, people who have never watched a game of football in their lives, white people, black people, and President Trump have all put their two cents in about the issue.
As a result, the NFL began working on a new rule that would require all players to stand on the field for the anthem, the alternative being a fine. Owners around the NFL, mostly older, white men, quickly voted to pass the rule in May. The rule was to be enforced beginning in the 2018-2019 season. However, back in July, the NFL player’s union filed a grievance to the NFL refuting this rule. In response, the NFL decided to table discussion of the new anthem policy for players, stating that the issue would be resolved later.
A fact that seems all too obvious these days, President Trump has been very vocal about the protests since the beginning, all the way through the tabling of the rule. The day that the players’ union filed a grievance, Trump tweeted, “The NFL national anthem debate is alive and well again - can't believe it. Isn't it in contract that players must stand at attention, hand on heart? The $40 million commissioner, meaning Roger Goodell, must now make a stand - first time kneeling, out for game; second time kneeling, out for season, no pay,” (Garcia-Navarro & Davis, 2018). It is easy to take a few quick minutes out of your day to search “NFL anthem rule,” or “NFL anthem protest,” and you’ll find hundreds of results. It ranges from major news outlets tweeting out articles about the NFL’s struggle to find a rule that can bridge the divide between everyone, celebrities and politicians weighing in on the situation, and the average American stating their opinion. Twitter is the most useful social media outlet in terms of a movement such as the one we see almost every Thursday, Sunday, and Monday nights. Major news outlets, more specifically sports media, tweet out articles for their masses of followers to see. In addition, these followers, average Americans, are very engrossed in professional football while it’s in-season. Football is what us Americans watch and talk about. When we see the protests happening right in front of us on live television and read about many celebrities and politicians responding to the protests in real time, the “tweets and the streets,” (Kidd, 2018), to pin a name to a two-faceted movement that is present in real-life and a presence on Twitter- is happening in real time. This simple act of kneeling during the national anthem, bravely started by Colin Kaepernick (whom has since been unofficially banned from the league for his actions, meaning he is doing something right), has multiplied in attention and effectiveness due to social media.

Word Count: 546








References
Garcia-Navarro, L., & Davis, W. (2018, May 27). How The NFL's New Rule On Protesting Is Being Perceived By Players. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2018/05/27/614810127/the-nfls-rule-new-on-kneeling
Kidd, Dustin. (2017). Social Media Freaks: Digital identity in the network society. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.

Labels:

Comments

  1. KHSeptember 20, 2018 at 1:55 PM

    Freddie,

    In terms of formatting, this is a vast improvement. Nonetheless, your post still doesn't conform to our "house style." Issues with spacing and far too much white space between the end of your post and your reference list further undermine this effort.

    Please review this document carefully and make certain your team members review your post as well.

    More substantively, I don't see an "outside" academic source here. As mentioned several times, you are welcome to use our textbooks, but you must make use of at least one academic paper, article or book chapter you've found on your own.

    Likewise, your citation for the NPR story is incomplete. And there's no real need to cite this story if you don't mention the source in your essay. Simply cite POTUS tweet and leave it at that.

    A few other issues to consider. First, check you use of the semi-colon toward the end of the first paragraph. Second, check your use of pronouns. You write, "What us Americans do..." That should be, "What we Americans do." Again, closer proof reading on your part and quality control from your group helps avoid these errors.

    In sum, this is a timely and relevant post. Still, you would do well to follow directions more closely, proof read your work, and focus your remarks more squarely on the role that (social) media plays in this ongoing struggle between players, owners, and politicians.

    PS. As I recall, the initial NFL policy gave players another option: remain off the field while the anthem plays.

    22/30 pts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DECONSTRUCTING HOMOSEXUAL STEREOTYPES

By Tess Weigel This year Netflix released a reboot of the Bravo series Queer Eye for the Straight Guy with a new cast of five gay men. The 2018 Queer Eye casts consists of Antoni Porowski, Tan France, Kamaro Brown, Bobby Berk, and Jonathan Van Ness. Each member of the Fab Five has a specialty of food, fashion, culture, design, and grooming, respectively. This reboot of Queer Eye is designed to deconstruct the negative and outdated stereotypes of gay men. In each episode, the Fab Five addresses topics such as homosexual relationships, homosexuality in religion, and minorities within the gay community.  Before 2018’s Queer Eye , only 3.6% of gay males have been portrayed in television against the 94.9% of heterosexual males (Kidd, 2014). While the frequency of the presence of gay men in the media has increased, the negative stereotype of how a gay man is portrayed amongst the plot line in television needs to be reconstructed to represent all different types of gay men. Fo...
2 comments
Read more

HANDS UP

By: Leda Turpen Throughout this week, my group is examining how politics have grown with the introduction of modern popular and celebrity culture in our society. While this is our main focus, I would like to shed light on an activism from the perspective of minority professional athletes, specifically the consequences they face when exercising their constitutional right to voice and demonstrate their political stances. I argue that minority celebrity athletes face a social identity threat when protesting for or against current political events, thus, are hesitant to speak up about them. Undoubtedly, our society is no stranger to the kind of reactions and responses celebrity activism can create. One prominent example being the case of Michael Brown, an African American who was shot in killed by a white police officer (Sanderson, Frederick, and Stocz, 2016). Shortly after the incident, the officer was not prosecuted, causing tension immediately (2016, p. 302). After the verdict, fi...
3 comments
Read more

PREVALENCE OF COLORISM IN BLACK AMERICAN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS

By: Cailey Griffin     It would be extremely difficult to make the argument that the media doesn’t have power. The media has the power to foster a sense of community amongst people by bringing friends and family together to view a television show. The media has the power to regulate the emotions of individuals by creating fictional characters the average viewer will become attached to. The media also has the power to serve as a representation of the different “types” of people in society. In media platforms there’s usually a clear representation of what it means to be a man, what it means to be a woman, what it means to be a person of color, and what it means to be a person from a particular socioeconomic background. These media representations of different groups and types of people are not always incorrect or negative. In fact, I would argue that media representations are largely positive for certain people. However, the group that seems to consistently get ...
1 comment
Read more