Skip to main content

The Media Proves It



By DaBreonna Doss

When doing scholarly research, scholars have this term called “coding”. Coding refers to the ways in which language is used, but underneath this language coded images pop up in our heads about what something is or looks like. For example, when you think of the words like American, nail technician, ghetto, etc you already have a preconceived notion of what these terms mean. Now, what if we take this coded language and apply it to the word “prisoner”, or more specifically “mentally ill prisoner”?

Scholars Schilders and Ogloff (2014) in “Review a point-of-reception mental health screening outcomes in an Australian Prison” states that 32-42 percent of the prisoners in the criminal justice system are mentally ill. This is close to half the prison population, and we must look into how these prisoners’ lives play out within the system.

The question I would like to explore is, within the criminal justice system, are government agencies providing the needed care that mentally ill prisoners require and are their current approaches effective? We will be using Schilders and Ogloff text, as well as the Netflix series Lockdown which dives deep into a prisoner’s life and experience. One commonality between the two is the implications set in place to assess prisoners on their entry to a new prison or reception as scholars refer. “... some prison officials merely asking prisoners on reception a few questions about their mental health history, with other prisons utilising more comprehensive screening...” (Schilders and Ogloff, 2014, p.481). In Lockdown, they talk about the fact that many procedures as far as mentally examining new entries, get prolonged because there are so many entries within a day. Another commonality is the ways in which they handle mentally ill prisoners. In season 3, episode 6, Lockdown talks about a woman with mental bipolar disorder. In response to her disorder, she only moves cells if necessary and sometimes placed in confinement for close watch. Schilder and Ogloff (2014) point out, “Eighty-five (23%) of the severe/acute group, 78 (19%) of the suspected/stable group and 530 (62%) of those with a history of mental illness were not recorded as being referred for an additional assessment...” (p.486). To define some terminology, “severe/acute” groups refer to mentally ill prisoners that are on close rotational watch for suicide and self-harm. “Suspected/stable” groups refer to those that have knowledgeable mental health issues but is not as bad, and then there are those who simply have a history of it. There are limited resources and no room for prisoners the require mental illness assistance. “Unsurprisingly, mentally ill prisoners required substantially more services than their non-mentally ill counterparts, which suggested that standard services offered by prisons may be less suitable for mentally ill prisoners” (Schilder and Ogloff, 2014, p.488).

I suggest that rather than using government finances to set in place disciplinary confinement cells, use it to create spaces that assist mental ill prisoners and problems will begin to find solutions. Schilder and Ogloff (2014) agrees with this solution and summarizes that by giving the expenses: prisoners have less chance of relapse, they can adjust into the prison society and outside the society, have necessary and constant treatment, room will come available, and prison staff will have assistance in situations outside of their training and a much safer environment (p.490-491). All-in-all, everyone wins!




Word Count: 559

Keywords: Mental health, prisoner, lockdown, Schilder and Ogloff, room




References


Myers, W. D., & Jackson, J. D. (2010). Lockdown. Recorded Books.


Schilders, M. R., & Ogloff, J. R. (2014). Review of point-of-reception mental health

          screening outcomes in an Australian prison. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry &


          Psychology, 25(4), 480-494.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DECONSTRUCTING HOMOSEXUAL STEREOTYPES

By Tess Weigel This year Netflix released a reboot of the Bravo series Queer Eye for the Straight Guy with a new cast of five gay men. The 2018 Queer Eye casts consists of Antoni Porowski, Tan France, Kamaro Brown, Bobby Berk, and Jonathan Van Ness. Each member of the Fab Five has a specialty of food, fashion, culture, design, and grooming, respectively. This reboot of Queer Eye is designed to deconstruct the negative and outdated stereotypes of gay men. In each episode, the Fab Five addresses topics such as homosexual relationships, homosexuality in religion, and minorities within the gay community.  Before 2018’s Queer Eye , only 3.6% of gay males have been portrayed in television against the 94.9% of heterosexual males (Kidd, 2014). While the frequency of the presence of gay men in the media has increased, the negative stereotype of how a gay man is portrayed amongst the plot line in television needs to be reconstructed to represent all different types of gay men. Fo...

PREVALENCE OF COLORISM IN BLACK AMERICAN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS

By: Cailey Griffin     It would be extremely difficult to make the argument that the media doesn’t have power. The media has the power to foster a sense of community amongst people by bringing friends and family together to view a television show. The media has the power to regulate the emotions of individuals by creating fictional characters the average viewer will become attached to. The media also has the power to serve as a representation of the different “types” of people in society. In media platforms there’s usually a clear representation of what it means to be a man, what it means to be a woman, what it means to be a person of color, and what it means to be a person from a particular socioeconomic background. These media representations of different groups and types of people are not always incorrect or negative. In fact, I would argue that media representations are largely positive for certain people. However, the group that seems to consistently get ...

ATHLETE STEREOTYPE AND GENDER, SEXUALITY

By Stella Ahn Athlete represents masculinity. When you think about the popular sport games in America such as football, baseball and basketball, the male athletes will directly come to your mind. As a matter of fact, athlete characters in the films and TV shows are often depicted as jocks; male, strong, aggressive. For example, Noah Puckerman, one of the main characters in Glee, is a football player. He takes a role of typical jock in the show, being aggressive and bullying other students. By constantly showing this kind of athlete characters, media reinforce the stereotype of athletes. If these stereotypes are wrong as previous posts mentioned, are jocks the only victim of it?  Considering athlete as masculine excludes people who have different genders and sexualities. This essay will talk about athlete’s gender and sexuality that excluded from media, specifically women and homosexual. Daniels posed a question (2008) , “If athlete means masculine, where do femininity a...