Skip to main content

SHAMELESS: MORE THAN ENTERTAINMENT


By Natalie Raskas

Social class identification has become increasingly vague in recent years. Most Americans consider themselves middle class whether they technically qualify or not (Martin, 2018).  However, the lower class, making up around 29% of the population, is still the socio-economic minority in America (Geewax, 2015).  One could argue that most middle- and upper-class Americans have no clue about the common struggles and daily challenges members of the lower-class face. Popular culture, specifically television is one of the primary ways people are exposed to different classes, other than their own.  Sadly, such entertainment can propagate broad misconceptions about the lower class, as is evident in the wildly popular Shameless television series.

Shameless, developed by John Wells is an American TV show based on an original produced in the U.K.  The show depicts a family, “The Gallaghers,” with six children ranging from 2-24 years old, a drunkard father, and an “in and out” bipolar mother.  As the series progresses, one of the teenagers has a baby, adding to the family’s struggles. The oldest daughter, Fiona Gallagher (Emmy Rossum), ultimately raises the other children in a small house in the south side of Chicago.  Americans loved watching this struggling lower-class family drama for nine seasons.

The issue with this show is how the Gallagher family grossly misrepresented a typical lower-class family in the U.S.   Such inaccuracies shape the way viewers, especially middle- or upper-class audiences, are informed about the lower class, which helps continue the stereotypes and misinformation that are spread.  The show portrays the father, Frank Gallagher (David Threlfall), as an alcoholic drug user. Further, the rest of the family members are constantly shown purchasing alcohol and drinking, supporting a skewed view that the lower-class people are typically alcoholics. Not only in the U.S. but around the world, “within critical discourse studies (CDS) it has been observed that working-class people are increasingly being represented in the media as excessive, repulsive, or silly on the basis of both of how they behave and also as regards style choices" (Eriksson, 2016, p. 304). Throughout the series, every character becomes violent in some form, further misrepresenting what it means to be lower class.

Dustin Kidd in his book Pop Culture Freaks discusses class within television and how it is sometimes invisible, but often times only featuring middle class and upper class. In this way, Shameless does well with creating a whole show based on a lower-class family instead of just featuring a side character or two.  Importantly Kidd mentions, “even as television offers varied representations of class experience, it also distorts them (2014, p.74).



In the short clip above drugs, alcohol, arguments, child abuse, stealing, and mental health are all touched upon or shown. In three minutes, the show has illustrated what it looks like to be part of the lower class (as a viewer might interpret), so imagine what the nine seasons have done with this representation.

Other than buying alcohol and drinking daily, the characters never mention government benefits or charitable aide, which some poor or lower-class citizens often pursue assistance even when working low wage jobs. According to the 2015 U.S. Census, approximately 52.2 million (or 21.3 percent) relied on some form of assistance (2015).  Although most of the children in the Gallagher family have jobs, there are six of them. Along with a baby and a small child, they are still able to live in a house, go to school, afford food, and buy extras such as cigarettes and alcohol. The family also seems to find time to have fun. In reality, a typical American lower-class family spends their time working and possibly depending on additional government benefits to help them (food stamps, unemployment, disability, healthcare, etc.).  Somehow, this family manages to get by without any government assistance but with a great deal of alcohol and dysfunction for entertainment’s sake.

Shameless is undeniably exaggerated for comedic purposes, but producers cannot forget about the power of their platform to inform as well as to entertain. The show missed a chance to depict the realities of America’s working class in a realistic matter.


                                                                   References

Eriksson, G. (2016). Humour, ridicule and the de-legitimization of the working class in Swedish Reality Television. Journal of Language and Politics Multimodality, Politics and Ideology, 15(3), 304-321. 

Geewax, M. (2015, December 09). The Tipping Point: Most Americans No Longer Are Middle Class. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/09/459087477/the-tipping-point-most-americans-no-longer-are-middle-class.

Kidd, D. (2018). Movin' on Up: Class Perspectives. In Pop Culture Freaks: Identity, mass media, and society (pp. 63-94). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Martin, E. (2017). 70% of Americans consider themselves middle class—but only 50% are. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/30/70-percent-of-americans-consider-themselves-middle-class-but-only-50-percent-are.html.

Masqueradeboy7 (Director). (2012, April 03). [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUNllG2SmFo.

U.S. Census (2015). 21.3 Percent of U.S. Population Participates in Government Assistance Programs Each Month. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-97.html.

Word count: 680

Comments

  1. Natalie-

    I chose to comment on your post, because Shameless is one of my favorite shows. Reading your post forced me to re-examine the show from a sociological and scholarly perspective. I also appreciate your decision to write about social class representation in media, because it seems to be a facet of identity that is often overlooked. Your comment about how much was packed into the three minute clip was an especially strong part of the post.

    A few notes- I think you should have made the distinction that class is a socially determined categorization. There is not a set in stone dollar figure that determines what social class a person belongs to. Additionally I think you should spend less time summarizing the show and more time expanding on your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Natalie, this is a well-researched and well-written post that adds additional insight into our discussion of class representation in (American) popular culture.

    Apart from minor issues with APA references and an error regarding lower class minority status, this essay engages with scholarship, news, analysis, as well as popular culture. (While it would be preferable to locate a study of class in US television, your point about global tendencies is well taken.)

    I especially appreciate your attention to the contradictions of this portrayal (e.g., housing, school, work, leisure, etc.) Among other things, this suggests that although Showtime is a subscription service, it adheres to advertiser-driven models of the sitcom that focus on conspicuous consumption, despite economic hardship.

    Then there's your writing. Just super! But as I mentioned last time, you do yourself and your classmates a disservice with your in-class reticence. I urge you to speak up. You've got plenty to say and you have a way of saying it.

    #JustSayin

    29 pts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DECONSTRUCTING HOMOSEXUAL STEREOTYPES

By Tess Weigel This year Netflix released a reboot of the Bravo series Queer Eye for the Straight Guy with a new cast of five gay men. The 2018 Queer Eye casts consists of Antoni Porowski, Tan France, Kamaro Brown, Bobby Berk, and Jonathan Van Ness. Each member of the Fab Five has a specialty of food, fashion, culture, design, and grooming, respectively. This reboot of Queer Eye is designed to deconstruct the negative and outdated stereotypes of gay men. In each episode, the Fab Five addresses topics such as homosexual relationships, homosexuality in religion, and minorities within the gay community.  Before 2018’s Queer Eye , only 3.6% of gay males have been portrayed in television against the 94.9% of heterosexual males (Kidd, 2014). While the frequency of the presence of gay men in the media has increased, the negative stereotype of how a gay man is portrayed amongst the plot line in television needs to be reconstructed to represent all different types of gay men. Fo...

HANDS UP

By: Leda Turpen Throughout this week, my group is examining how politics have grown with the introduction of modern popular and celebrity culture in our society. While this is our main focus, I would like to shed light on an activism from the perspective of minority professional athletes, specifically the consequences they face when exercising their constitutional right to voice and demonstrate their political stances. I argue that minority celebrity athletes face a social identity threat when protesting for or against current political events, thus, are hesitant to speak up about them. Undoubtedly, our society is no stranger to the kind of reactions and responses celebrity activism can create. One prominent example being the case of Michael Brown, an African American who was shot in killed by a white police officer (Sanderson, Frederick, and Stocz, 2016). Shortly after the incident, the officer was not prosecuted, causing tension immediately (2016, p. 302). After the verdict, fi...

Audience/Producer

By: Duncan West 10/2/2018 Social media has given the audience ,us as user, to actually produce, rather than just take in the material. This in a way evens the Social Media hierarchy to a some what even playing field. Giving everyone a voice to be heard. Without Social Media the only way to really get your voice out would be to be interviewed, but the only people being interviewed were celebrities. Now that we do have social media everyones opinions are there to be read at the click of a button. This gives the average person a voice for getting their ideas out there. This power should not be looked upon lightly. Movements can be started in the matter of hours with social media. These movements can be very powerful and quick spreading especially with the help of a celebrity. Celebrities have huge impacts on the social media world these impacts can be both positive and negative. That is why Social Media is nothing to be taken lightly but rather a tool that can be used for good.  ...