Skip to main content

THE BLACKER THE BERRY, THE SWEETER THE JUICE?

 By Aleysha Ward 

“You are just as dark as the bottom of my shoe”, “Your skin color is not light enough to hang with us” and “You're so pretty for a black girl.” These are just some of the comments that black women have had to listen to while growing up. As a brown skinned black women, it is frustrating to know that my skin color will always be viewed as negative by society. Why? Well, because it is not close to a Caucasians skin color. Skin tone is a characteristic that can affect a person’s life in both positive and negative ways. Often times, our society has shown us that being of a lighter complexion or closer to a Caucasian’s skin color will provide us with benefits such as higher educational and career opportunities, a greater chance at marriage, and having the ability to be less conscious about your skin color. Although this is not true, factors as such do affect a black women’s self esteem and self efficacy. The issue of colorism continues to divide and shape the life experiences of black women to the point where they are continuously thinking about their race and gender.

Skin color is often correlated with feelings of self-worth, attractiveness or satisfaction with oneself. This is due to the fact that skin color is one of the most visible features on a person.“Girls as young as six are twice as likely as boys to be sensitive to the social importance of skin color” (Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.339). The importance of skin color to attractiveness begins as early as childhood. Thus, showing how at a young age black girls are thinking about whether or not they will be seen as attractive or unattractive because their skin color ultimately reveals how detrimental colorism can be to a person’s character. Black women face problems of racism and sexism, being black and being female all coming down to colorism. Colorism and its stressors have affected the way in which black women view and validate themselves. Society has showed us that not only is our skin tone a problem but so is our gender, therefore, lowering a black woman’s self-esteem and their ability to succeed.

If bodily attributes are judged as positive then one will feel positive about themselves. “Self-efficacy is the belief or idea that one can master situations and control events”(Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.341). Most people with high self-efficacy are more likely to be determined and driven to be successful; however, those who have a low self-efficacy are more likely to struggle with overcoming coming a particular obstacle. Social media sites such as Twitter use hashtags like #lightskinsdoitbetter or #lightskinslivinlavish which supports the idea that black women can assume that because of their skin color it will be harder for them to succeed in society. Visiting social media sites as such, confirms the negative mindset that black women have about themselves. With that being said, if black women keep a positive self-efficacy in mind it will help them to build their self-efficacy and ultimately feel empowered or confident.

What does this all mean for our society? It means that like Thompson and Keith have been arguing, we need to work towards finding ways in which a black woman's skin color will not be the determining factor in everything that she does in life. Society and mainstream media tend to frame the skin color of a black women in a negative way which ultimately affects her self-esteem. With the help of self confidence, us black women will continue to “glow and grow” despite the struggles that we are faced with. 






References

Thompson, M., & Keith, V. (2001). The blacker the berry: gender, skin Tone, self-Esteem, and self-efficacy. Gender and Society,15(3), 336-357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3081888



Word count: 605

Comments

  1. Aleysha,

    This is a thoughtful essay. However, there's very little discussion of media here.

    That's not to say this doesn't make a contribution to our online discussion. However, the lack of concrete and sustained discussion of media's role in perpetuating (or challenging) the colorism you've identified misses the point of these posts.

    A more thorough and sustained discussion of the hashtags you mention would make this more relevant for our purposes here. Indeed, these tags seem to be a "fault line" in what Kidd calls "Black Twitter" that seems ripe for analysis and critique.

    A few lingering issues with punctuation and APA reference style further undermine your efforts.

    24 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aleysha-


    First I wanna start by saying that I applaud you for taking on such a prevalent yet touchy topic. I really enjoyed the fact that you started your post with quotes and examples of what you were going to be addressing throughout the entire essay.


    Like Professor Howley, it would have been nice to see the connection with media more throughout your post because you introduced the topic very well.


    Destiney

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DECONSTRUCTING HOMOSEXUAL STEREOTYPES

By Tess Weigel This year Netflix released a reboot of the Bravo series Queer Eye for the Straight Guy with a new cast of five gay men. The 2018 Queer Eye casts consists of Antoni Porowski, Tan France, Kamaro Brown, Bobby Berk, and Jonathan Van Ness. Each member of the Fab Five has a specialty of food, fashion, culture, design, and grooming, respectively. This reboot of Queer Eye is designed to deconstruct the negative and outdated stereotypes of gay men. In each episode, the Fab Five addresses topics such as homosexual relationships, homosexuality in religion, and minorities within the gay community.  Before 2018’s Queer Eye , only 3.6% of gay males have been portrayed in television against the 94.9% of heterosexual males (Kidd, 2014). While the frequency of the presence of gay men in the media has increased, the negative stereotype of how a gay man is portrayed amongst the plot line in television needs to be reconstructed to represent all different types of gay men. Fo...

HANDS UP

By: Leda Turpen Throughout this week, my group is examining how politics have grown with the introduction of modern popular and celebrity culture in our society. While this is our main focus, I would like to shed light on an activism from the perspective of minority professional athletes, specifically the consequences they face when exercising their constitutional right to voice and demonstrate their political stances. I argue that minority celebrity athletes face a social identity threat when protesting for or against current political events, thus, are hesitant to speak up about them. Undoubtedly, our society is no stranger to the kind of reactions and responses celebrity activism can create. One prominent example being the case of Michael Brown, an African American who was shot in killed by a white police officer (Sanderson, Frederick, and Stocz, 2016). Shortly after the incident, the officer was not prosecuted, causing tension immediately (2016, p. 302). After the verdict, fi...

PREVALENCE OF COLORISM IN BLACK AMERICAN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS

By: Cailey Griffin     It would be extremely difficult to make the argument that the media doesn’t have power. The media has the power to foster a sense of community amongst people by bringing friends and family together to view a television show. The media has the power to regulate the emotions of individuals by creating fictional characters the average viewer will become attached to. The media also has the power to serve as a representation of the different “types” of people in society. In media platforms there’s usually a clear representation of what it means to be a man, what it means to be a woman, what it means to be a person of color, and what it means to be a person from a particular socioeconomic background. These media representations of different groups and types of people are not always incorrect or negative. In fact, I would argue that media representations are largely positive for certain people. However, the group that seems to consistently get ...