Skip to main content

THE BLACKER THE BERRY, THE SWEETER THE JUICE?

 By Aleysha Ward 

“You are just as dark as the bottom of my shoe”, “Your skin color is not light enough to hang with us” and “You're so pretty for a black girl.” These are just some of the comments that black women have had to listen to while growing up. As a brown skinned black women, it is frustrating to know that my skin color will always be viewed as negative by society. Why? Well, because it is not close to a Caucasians skin color. Skin tone is a characteristic that can affect a person’s life in both positive and negative ways. Often times, our society has shown us that being of a lighter complexion or closer to a Caucasian’s skin color will provide us with benefits such as higher educational and career opportunities, a greater chance at marriage, and having the ability to be less conscious about your skin color. Although this is not true, factors as such do affect a black women’s self esteem and self efficacy. The issue of colorism continues to divide and shape the life experiences of black women to the point where they are continuously thinking about their race and gender.

Skin color is often correlated with feelings of self-worth, attractiveness or satisfaction with oneself. This is due to the fact that skin color is one of the most visible features on a person.“Girls as young as six are twice as likely as boys to be sensitive to the social importance of skin color” (Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.339). The importance of skin color to attractiveness begins as early as childhood. Thus, showing how at a young age black girls are thinking about whether or not they will be seen as attractive or unattractive because their skin color ultimately reveals how detrimental colorism can be to a person’s character. Black women face problems of racism and sexism, being black and being female all coming down to colorism. Colorism and its stressors have affected the way in which black women view and validate themselves. Society has showed us that not only is our skin tone a problem but so is our gender, therefore, lowering a black woman’s self-esteem and their ability to succeed.

If bodily attributes are judged as positive then one will feel positive about themselves. “Self-efficacy is the belief or idea that one can master situations and control events”(Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.341). Most people with high self-efficacy are more likely to be determined and driven to be successful; however, those who have a low self-efficacy are more likely to struggle with overcoming coming a particular obstacle. Social media sites such as Twitter use hashtags like #lightskinsdoitbetter or #lightskinslivinlavish which supports the idea that black women can assume that because of their skin color it will be harder for them to succeed in society. Visiting social media sites as such, confirms the negative mindset that black women have about themselves. With that being said, if black women keep a positive self-efficacy in mind it will help them to build their self-efficacy and ultimately feel empowered or confident.

What does this all mean for our society? It means that like Thompson and Keith have been arguing, we need to work towards finding ways in which a black woman's skin color will not be the determining factor in everything that she does in life. Society and mainstream media tend to frame the skin color of a black women in a negative way which ultimately affects her self-esteem. With the help of self confidence, us black women will continue to “glow and grow” despite the struggles that we are faced with. 






References

Thompson, M., & Keith, V. (2001). The blacker the berry: gender, skin Tone, self-Esteem, and self-efficacy. Gender and Society,15(3), 336-357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3081888



Word count: 605

Comments

  1. Aleysha,

    This is a thoughtful essay. However, there's very little discussion of media here.

    That's not to say this doesn't make a contribution to our online discussion. However, the lack of concrete and sustained discussion of media's role in perpetuating (or challenging) the colorism you've identified misses the point of these posts.

    A more thorough and sustained discussion of the hashtags you mention would make this more relevant for our purposes here. Indeed, these tags seem to be a "fault line" in what Kidd calls "Black Twitter" that seems ripe for analysis and critique.

    A few lingering issues with punctuation and APA reference style further undermine your efforts.

    24 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aleysha-


    First I wanna start by saying that I applaud you for taking on such a prevalent yet touchy topic. I really enjoyed the fact that you started your post with quotes and examples of what you were going to be addressing throughout the entire essay.


    Like Professor Howley, it would have been nice to see the connection with media more throughout your post because you introduced the topic very well.


    Destiney

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

STUDENT-ATHLETES AND MENTAL HEALTH

STUDENT-ATHLETES AND MENTAL HEALTH Jarrod Stiver There has always been a common misconception that student-athletes do not struggle with mental health issues outside of sports. Typically, athletes believe  must be tough, show no signs of weakness or they will be beat. Many people who see these athletes, automatically think of who they are on the field, court or track; and envision themselves doing that and being that “star” with their abilities, and fame. The people who believe their heroes have the most perfect lives going to school for free to play sports, and having people flock after them at any given second of their lives. However, we can day dream about their lives all we want but the fact is that mental health issues such as; anxiety, depression, substance abuse, eating disorders, and many more still apply to our heroes on the field. No matter the amount of money someone makes or the things that are given to them, mental health issues can still ta...

WHAT MADE THE L WORD SO GROUNDBREAKING?

By Pia Ocvirk Historically, lesbian characters have been virtually non-existent on American television. Ellen DeGeneres’s televised coming out on her popular show Ellen in 1997 paved the way for lesbian characters in primetime television. Despite the gains made for lesbian characters, they were and still are, more often than not, portrayed in heterosexual narratives and tailored almost solely for a heterosexual audience (Lee & Meyer, 2010). When The L Word premiered on Showtime in 2004, the show became the first ever to feature the main cast of exclusively queer women, most of whom were lesbians. Written, created and directed by women for women, the show told stories that had never before been seen on television (Bendix, 2017). The L Word touched on subjects such as same-sex parenting, “don’t ask, don’t tell,” addiction, cancer, disability, coming out and, most importantly, the heterosexual male gaze. The L Word made the male gaze a central issue in its first two season...

JOCK STEREOTYPES IN FILM

By Chase Andries It is common when people think of a jock today, the majority imagine an athlete. An athlete who is successful in their sport, aggressive, violent, arrogant, unintelligent, dim-witted, and foolish; a powerful figure in their society who thinks they are untouchable and above everyone else. American film mirrors these same ideas and principles in our culture today. The characters that play the athletes regularly share the same characteristics as the “typical jock” we think of in our society. For example, in the movie, 17 again starring Zac Efron, is a character named Stan. Stan is the captain of the basketball team, a delinquent, and a bully who follows the stereotypes of being aggressive, unintelligent, and violent which is displayed throughout the film. Stan is clearly the athletic jock from start to finish, but there seems to be an underlying stigma that factors into his character the audience may not realize. In the movie , the main protagonist na...