Skip to main content

THE BLACKER THE BERRY, THE SWEETER THE JUICE?

 By Aleysha Ward 

“You are just as dark as the bottom of my shoe”, “Your skin color is not light enough to hang with us” and “You're so pretty for a black girl.” These are just some of the comments that black women have had to listen to while growing up. As a brown skinned black women, it is frustrating to know that my skin color will always be viewed as negative by society. Why? Well, because it is not close to a Caucasians skin color. Skin tone is a characteristic that can affect a person’s life in both positive and negative ways. Often times, our society has shown us that being of a lighter complexion or closer to a Caucasian’s skin color will provide us with benefits such as higher educational and career opportunities, a greater chance at marriage, and having the ability to be less conscious about your skin color. Although this is not true, factors as such do affect a black women’s self esteem and self efficacy. The issue of colorism continues to divide and shape the life experiences of black women to the point where they are continuously thinking about their race and gender.

Skin color is often correlated with feelings of self-worth, attractiveness or satisfaction with oneself. This is due to the fact that skin color is one of the most visible features on a person.“Girls as young as six are twice as likely as boys to be sensitive to the social importance of skin color” (Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.339). The importance of skin color to attractiveness begins as early as childhood. Thus, showing how at a young age black girls are thinking about whether or not they will be seen as attractive or unattractive because their skin color ultimately reveals how detrimental colorism can be to a person’s character. Black women face problems of racism and sexism, being black and being female all coming down to colorism. Colorism and its stressors have affected the way in which black women view and validate themselves. Society has showed us that not only is our skin tone a problem but so is our gender, therefore, lowering a black woman’s self-esteem and their ability to succeed.

If bodily attributes are judged as positive then one will feel positive about themselves. “Self-efficacy is the belief or idea that one can master situations and control events”(Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.341). Most people with high self-efficacy are more likely to be determined and driven to be successful; however, those who have a low self-efficacy are more likely to struggle with overcoming coming a particular obstacle. Social media sites such as Twitter use hashtags like #lightskinsdoitbetter or #lightskinslivinlavish which supports the idea that black women can assume that because of their skin color it will be harder for them to succeed in society. Visiting social media sites as such, confirms the negative mindset that black women have about themselves. With that being said, if black women keep a positive self-efficacy in mind it will help them to build their self-efficacy and ultimately feel empowered or confident.

What does this all mean for our society? It means that like Thompson and Keith have been arguing, we need to work towards finding ways in which a black woman's skin color will not be the determining factor in everything that she does in life. Society and mainstream media tend to frame the skin color of a black women in a negative way which ultimately affects her self-esteem. With the help of self confidence, us black women will continue to “glow and grow” despite the struggles that we are faced with. 






References

Thompson, M., & Keith, V. (2001). The blacker the berry: gender, skin Tone, self-Esteem, and self-efficacy. Gender and Society,15(3), 336-357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3081888



Word count: 605

Comments

  1. Aleysha,

    This is a thoughtful essay. However, there's very little discussion of media here.

    That's not to say this doesn't make a contribution to our online discussion. However, the lack of concrete and sustained discussion of media's role in perpetuating (or challenging) the colorism you've identified misses the point of these posts.

    A more thorough and sustained discussion of the hashtags you mention would make this more relevant for our purposes here. Indeed, these tags seem to be a "fault line" in what Kidd calls "Black Twitter" that seems ripe for analysis and critique.

    A few lingering issues with punctuation and APA reference style further undermine your efforts.

    24 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aleysha-


    First I wanna start by saying that I applaud you for taking on such a prevalent yet touchy topic. I really enjoyed the fact that you started your post with quotes and examples of what you were going to be addressing throughout the entire essay.


    Like Professor Howley, it would have been nice to see the connection with media more throughout your post because you introduced the topic very well.


    Destiney

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ARE WE THE WEIRD ONES?

 By: Destiney Davis Eighteen-year-old Sam Gardner is your typical high school boy who loves his family, sports etc. except there’s one thing that makes him slightly different. Sam is on the autism spectrum (ASD). Atypical , it is a coming of age Netflix series that takes its viewers on a wild ride with Sam Gardner and his daily struggles with being a high school student with autism. The first season begins with what any teenage boy enjoys, girls. Sam Gardner begins asking advice from father about girls and dating and is welcomed with loads of advice from his father, Doug. But from his mother, Sam receives almost complete resentment and negativity when bringing upon the idea of dating. But why? Why is such a normal teenage action being turned down simply because of a mental disability? According to the National Institute of Health, about 1 in 68 children are diagnosed with ASD. Disabilities are quite difficult to discuss whether it be in our own communities or the media its

ARTISTS OR SEX OBJECTS?

By Pia Ocvirk When Rita Ora announced her new single “Girls” earlier this year, the song was initially intended as an anthem celebrating both bisexuality and female empowerment. However, when the song was released in May, it proved to be the complete opposite (Kheraj, 2018). Both the lyrics and the music video were yet another example of pop culture misrepresenting women, queer women in this case, while fueling the male gaze. While both the song and Rita Ora quickly received backlash, Ora is not the person to blame. The entire music industry has been fostering hypersexualization and objectification of female artists for decades. At midnight on August 1, 1981, MTV was born and music suddenly became a visual medium. Aware of the degree to which their sexuality was being evaluated in music videos, female artists started to create powerful hypersexualized personas in response to male domination (Donze, 2011). The 1980s saw the rise of multiple pop divas, many of whom owed part o

ATHLETE STEREOTYPE AND GENDER, SEXUALITY

By Stella Ahn Athlete represents masculinity. When you think about the popular sport games in America such as football, baseball and basketball, the male athletes will directly come to your mind. As a matter of fact, athlete characters in the films and TV shows are often depicted as jocks; male, strong, aggressive. For example, Noah Puckerman, one of the main characters in Glee, is a football player. He takes a role of typical jock in the show, being aggressive and bullying other students. By constantly showing this kind of athlete characters, media reinforce the stereotype of athletes. If these stereotypes are wrong as previous posts mentioned, are jocks the only victim of it?  Considering athlete as masculine excludes people who have different genders and sexualities. This essay will talk about athlete’s gender and sexuality that excluded from media, specifically women and homosexual. Daniels posed a question (2008) , “If athlete means masculine, where do femininity a