Skip to main content

THE BLACKER THE BERRY, THE SWEETER THE JUICE?

 By Aleysha Ward 

“You are just as dark as the bottom of my shoe”, “Your skin color is not light enough to hang with us” and “You're so pretty for a black girl.” These are just some of the comments that black women have had to listen to while growing up. As a brown skinned black women, it is frustrating to know that my skin color will always be viewed as negative by society. Why? Well, because it is not close to a Caucasians skin color. Skin tone is a characteristic that can affect a person’s life in both positive and negative ways. Often times, our society has shown us that being of a lighter complexion or closer to a Caucasian’s skin color will provide us with benefits such as higher educational and career opportunities, a greater chance at marriage, and having the ability to be less conscious about your skin color. Although this is not true, factors as such do affect a black women’s self esteem and self efficacy. The issue of colorism continues to divide and shape the life experiences of black women to the point where they are continuously thinking about their race and gender.

Skin color is often correlated with feelings of self-worth, attractiveness or satisfaction with oneself. This is due to the fact that skin color is one of the most visible features on a person.“Girls as young as six are twice as likely as boys to be sensitive to the social importance of skin color” (Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.339). The importance of skin color to attractiveness begins as early as childhood. Thus, showing how at a young age black girls are thinking about whether or not they will be seen as attractive or unattractive because their skin color ultimately reveals how detrimental colorism can be to a person’s character. Black women face problems of racism and sexism, being black and being female all coming down to colorism. Colorism and its stressors have affected the way in which black women view and validate themselves. Society has showed us that not only is our skin tone a problem but so is our gender, therefore, lowering a black woman’s self-esteem and their ability to succeed.

If bodily attributes are judged as positive then one will feel positive about themselves. “Self-efficacy is the belief or idea that one can master situations and control events”(Thompson & Keith, 2001, p.341). Most people with high self-efficacy are more likely to be determined and driven to be successful; however, those who have a low self-efficacy are more likely to struggle with overcoming coming a particular obstacle. Social media sites such as Twitter use hashtags like #lightskinsdoitbetter or #lightskinslivinlavish which supports the idea that black women can assume that because of their skin color it will be harder for them to succeed in society. Visiting social media sites as such, confirms the negative mindset that black women have about themselves. With that being said, if black women keep a positive self-efficacy in mind it will help them to build their self-efficacy and ultimately feel empowered or confident.

What does this all mean for our society? It means that like Thompson and Keith have been arguing, we need to work towards finding ways in which a black woman's skin color will not be the determining factor in everything that she does in life. Society and mainstream media tend to frame the skin color of a black women in a negative way which ultimately affects her self-esteem. With the help of self confidence, us black women will continue to “glow and grow” despite the struggles that we are faced with. 






References

Thompson, M., & Keith, V. (2001). The blacker the berry: gender, skin Tone, self-Esteem, and self-efficacy. Gender and Society,15(3), 336-357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3081888



Word count: 605

Comments

  1. Aleysha,

    This is a thoughtful essay. However, there's very little discussion of media here.

    That's not to say this doesn't make a contribution to our online discussion. However, the lack of concrete and sustained discussion of media's role in perpetuating (or challenging) the colorism you've identified misses the point of these posts.

    A more thorough and sustained discussion of the hashtags you mention would make this more relevant for our purposes here. Indeed, these tags seem to be a "fault line" in what Kidd calls "Black Twitter" that seems ripe for analysis and critique.

    A few lingering issues with punctuation and APA reference style further undermine your efforts.

    24 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aleysha-


    First I wanna start by saying that I applaud you for taking on such a prevalent yet touchy topic. I really enjoyed the fact that you started your post with quotes and examples of what you were going to be addressing throughout the entire essay.


    Like Professor Howley, it would have been nice to see the connection with media more throughout your post because you introduced the topic very well.


    Destiney

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Move Over Kim Here Comes The Donald

Move Over Kim Here Comes The Donald By Caleb Baue         The American media’s new favorite celebrity power couple isn’t quite what we all expected. The all-star line up including Thomas Rhett and Lauren Atkins, Will and Jada Smith, Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively, are now joined by Kanye West and Donald Trump. Celebrity endorsement gained its popularity back in 2004 when Red Sox Pitcher Curt Schilling publicly endorsed former President George W. Bush. Since then, we’ve seen pairs like Michael J. Fox and current senator Claire McCaskill in 2006, Hank Williams Jr. and the late John McCain in 2008 and Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama in 2008. (Ivory, Morin, Tubbs, 2012) Celebrity endorsement is most commonly used for product advertisement, companies have been using athletes, singers, actors, and public figures in advertisements for years. The goal or idea behind these endorsements is that they will positively change the audience’s perception of the product and the co...

INFOTAINMENT: A SOURCE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY AND PARTICIPATION

By Georges Azouri Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Trevor Noah. These are all household names of television hosts on shows such as The Daily Show and The Colbert Report . Both shows are infotainment programs that inform their viewers on current news and entertain them in a satirical way. While there is great comedic value provided by these programs, there is even greater value to the political culture of the United States. Infotainment programs are not new, rather the influence they can have on an audience is new. Shows like The Daily Show or The Colbert Report share news stories and often political stories in a satirical manner. In doing so these programs are still educating audiences on politics even if it may be skewed. Political efficacy is the belief that one is able to strongly influence politics and usually is tied to political participation. A study done on adolescents showed that, “nontraditional sources of political information on television (late-night comedy) i...

VLOGGING; MIXED BLESSING

By Stella Ahn Vlogging; video blogging is one of the most common types of user-generated content in social media, especially in YouTube. Increasing attention toward Vlog and Vlogger have made another kind of celebrities. YouTube celebrities make revenue from various sources based on their contents and fame such as advertisement and sponsorship. As they became rich and popular, they have huge impact on their followers. Their contents can encourage social movement and people in minor community. On the other hand, growing trend of Vlogging also can cause negative effect. Therefore, this post will discuss about how Vlogging effect for both producer and consumer.    Vloggers have advantages in terms of communication and interaction, because they can communicate directly with their followers via contents and comments. This characteristic of social media made Vlog celebrities be able to have influence among social movements and communities. Arthurs take an example of...