Skip to main content

HANDS UP


By: Leda Turpen Throughout this week, my group is examining how politics have grown with the introduction of modern popular and celebrity culture in our society. While this is our main focus, I would like to shed light on an activism from the perspective of minority professional athletes, specifically the consequences they face when exercising their constitutional right to voice and demonstrate their political stances. I argue that minority celebrity athletes face a social identity threat when protesting for or against current political events, thus, are hesitant to speak up about them. Undoubtedly, our society is no stranger to the kind of reactions and responses celebrity activism can create. One prominent example being the case of Michael Brown, an African American who was shot in killed by a white police officer (Sanderson, Frederick, and Stocz, 2016). Shortly after the incident, the officer was not prosecuted, causing tension immediately (2016, p. 302). After the verdict, five NFL African American St. Louis Rams players locked hands and displayed a “hands-up” gesture during player introductions in reaction to the high-stake racial tensions (p. 301).
The Ram’s players actions exploded on social media, Twitter and Facebook, which allowed for users to create an array of offensive hashtags and attack the player’s actions. On both Twitter and Facebook, there was anything from an immense amount of racist remarks, referring to the players as “Thugs standing up for other thugs” (Sanderson, et al., 2016, p. 312), to users threatening the St. Louis Rams. The authors of this article conducted a study on these particular athletes’ activism, and the chaos on social media; both of which lead to two major protruding themes.
                                   Image result for athlete activism
Primarily, Pelak’s work (as cited in Sanderson, et al., 2016) describes professional athletes as social role models that can become involved in social movements through their esoteric power of becoming “agents of social change” (pg. 303). Although the authors point out that when minority athletes speak out on social issues, it often creates controversy (p. 303). First we must ask, why is this the case? The authors examine how individuals have personal and social identities, and that one’s social identity is linked to their demographic classification (Sanderson, et al., 2016, p. 306). Essentially, minority athletes are less likely to speak up because their opinion is negatively attached to their social identity, consequently, this leads society to undermine the individual’s value and further perpetuate stereotypes.
We see this today with Colin Kaepernick, former football quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers. When Nike chose him to represent their brand after the huge uproar over his decision to take a knee during the national anthem. Due to the fact that this was such a controversial decision, the attention surrounding Kaepernick was heightened. His social identity was already at stake when he began kneeling during the national anthem, but Nike’s identity is now at stake because it is perceived that they support Kaepernick’s actions. This attests to the pushback minority professional athletes get for peacefully protesting a political and social issue that specifically pertains to racism.
The consequences that arise from minority athlete activism minimize the social issues they initially advocate for. Accordingly, activism can come from anyone, although it may be interpreted differently. In particular, it is evident why minority athletes are reluctant to advocate for political issues when they are criticized for speaking up, yet also condemned when they do not. References
Sanderson, J., Frederick, E., & Stocz, M. (2016). When athlete activism clashes with group values: Social identity threat management via social media. Mass Communication & Society, 19(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1128549 Word Count: 561

Comments

  1. Leda,

    This post makes a welcome contribution to your group's theme week on celebrity and politics. More specifically, you call attention to the difficulty professional athletes face when they take political positions in the public sphere.

    This is no small matter. Celebrities frequently wear their politics on their sleeves, but when athletes do so the "pushback" can be considerable. Note the racial dynamics in all of this – something your post doesn't directly address.

    On the upside, this is well written and supported with relevant academic literature. You make good use of this material to discuss the intersection of sport, celebrity, and politics.

    A few things for future reference. First, it isn't clear how, precisely, your using the notion of "social identity" in your thesis. It becomes clearer later in your post. You may want to "borrow" the authors' definition and use that up top of your post.

    Then there are some curious issues of word choice (e.g., "protruding themes," and "esoteric power"). I get it, but this can be stated with greater accuracy and clarity.

    In short, this is a solid effort that draws on recent events to make a welcome contribution to our ongoing discussion.

    A more concrete discussion of the racial aspect of all this, and the chilling effect criticism has on "activist" athletes, would enhance this discussion. After all Kaepernick has effectively been banned from playing because he "took a knee."

    27 pts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Leda,

    I think your post overall helps readers understand why media activism can come with consequences depending on your identity. I really enjoyed the several different connections and that you added Michael Brown's story as a background to show how deep these online protests really go.

    As a suggestion however, maybe diving deeper into the topic of how these athletes are framed by different conservative media sites as well as the NFL in general. I believe your post would be more powerful if you included the point that this media backlash was so powerful that it swayed the opinions of some NFL team owners to not allow kneeling. This way you emphasize the importance of media activism and its backlash. But overall this was great!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Leda,
    I think it is great that you have shined light on a very relevant topic in today's society. It seems more athletes/celebs like Colin Kaepernick are not able to create the platfrom they would hope to create based on beliefs, ethnicity, etc. I also like how you integrated media activism and its effects into your post. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Media Proves It

By DaBreonna Doss When doing scholarly research, scholars have this term called “coding”. Coding refers to the ways in which language is used, but underneath this language coded images pop up in our heads about what something is or looks like. For example, when you think of the words like American, nail technician, ghetto, etc you already have a preconceived notion of what these terms mean. Now, what if we take this coded language and apply it to the word “prisoner”, or more specifically “mentally ill prisoner”? Scholars Schilders and Ogloff (2014) in “Review a point-of-reception mental health screening outcomes in an Australian Prison” states that 32-42 percent of the prisoners in the criminal justice system are mentally ill. This is close to half the prison population, and we must look into how these prisoners’ lives play out within the system. The question I would like to explore is, within the criminal justice system, are government agencies providing the needed care that mentall...

Bisexuality in Popular Television

By Sydney Secuskie Popular culture plays a strong role in the way teens develop and respond to their sexuality. It helps young adults develop a way to interact with their counterparts and helps them get a sense of sexuality and sexual experiences that they may experience in their young lives. However, what happens to this development when the sexuality an individual identifies with is rarely portrayed in popular films and television series? Heterosexuality is normalized within numerous popular television series, making young teens of the LGBTQ+ community struggle to find a character to resonate with. Callie Torres, a bisexual character in the TV hit show Grey’s Anatomy , exemplifies the struggles that many individuals in the LGBTQ+ community face when trying to identify their sexuality. Callie begins the first season as a straight, married female; however, she eventually falls in love with a female doctor after her divorce with her husband. Callie constantly denied her bisexual...

INFOTAINMENT: A SOURCE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY AND PARTICIPATION

By Georges Azouri Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Trevor Noah. These are all household names of television hosts on shows such as The Daily Show and The Colbert Report . Both shows are infotainment programs that inform their viewers on current news and entertain them in a satirical way. While there is great comedic value provided by these programs, there is even greater value to the political culture of the United States. Infotainment programs are not new, rather the influence they can have on an audience is new. Shows like The Daily Show or The Colbert Report share news stories and often political stories in a satirical manner. In doing so these programs are still educating audiences on politics even if it may be skewed. Political efficacy is the belief that one is able to strongly influence politics and usually is tied to political participation. A study done on adolescents showed that, “nontraditional sources of political information on television (late-night comedy) i...